Investigating Content and Language Integration in an EFL Textbook: A Corpus-Based Study

https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2010.1.1.2

Authors

  • Amna Arshad PhD Candidate, Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Asim Mehmood Dean Faculty of Social Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Keywords:

Bloom’s taxonomy, content and language integrated learning, textbook evaluation

Abstract

This research evaluates an English language textbook from CLIL perspective. For this purpose, an intermediate level (grade-11) English language textbook has been selected and analyzed utilizing Coyle’s conceptual framework of 4Cs (i.e. content, cognition, communication and culture).Content, communication, and culture have been explored through a checklist, whereas cognition has been explored by developing a corpus from the questions given in the exercises of the textbook and analyzing in the light of Bloom’s taxonomy. The results reveal certain breeches between CLIL features and the textbook’s contents. Layout, learning outcomes, organization of the content, subject matter, authenticity of the text, exercises, and focus on language skills does not seem to match with CLIL perspectives. Listening and speaking skills are observed to be ignored. Moreover, the exercises do not seem to foster critical thinking and interaction between students and teachers. Most of the questions are observed covering only first two levels (i.e. knowledge and comprehension) of Bloom’s taxonomy. The study concludes that CLIL principles are not integrated in the textbook. Therefore, the textbook is not suitable to an ESL/EFL setting.

References

AbdelWahab, M. M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(3), 55-70.

Aftab, A. (2012). English language textbooks evaluation in Pakistan.Unpublished PhD Thesis. The University of Birmingham, UK.

Ahmad, M., Ismail, M. K. A., & Saba, N. (2019). Evaluación de unlibro de texto de inglés: Un studio sobre'Inglés-2'a la luz de losprincipios de laenseñanzacomunicativa de la lengua (Evaluating an English language textbook: A study on ‘English-2’ in the light of communicative language teaching principles). Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 6, 1-38.

Ahuvia, A. (2001). Traditional, interpretive, and reception-based content analyses: Improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern. Social Indicators Research, 54(2), 139-172.

Ahymadpoor, Z. (2004). Studying the problems of EFL teaching in high schools. The Roshd ELT Journal, 18(71), 15-21.

Alptekin, C. (1993). Target-language culture in EFL materials. ELT Journal, 47(2), 136-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.2.136

Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(2), 1-9.

Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (Vol. 79). Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

Banegas, D. L. (2011). Content and language integrated learning in Argentina 2008-2011. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 32-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2011.4.2.4

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals-handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York. McKay.

Brazil, D., Coulthard, M., & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. New York: Longman.

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Coyle, D. (1999). Supporting students in content and language integrated learning contexts: Planning for effective classrooms. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning through a Foreign Language: Models, Methods and Outcomes (pp. 46-62). London, United Kingdom: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.

Coyle, D. (2005). Content and language integrated learning. Motivating learners and teachers. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London: Heinemann.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms (Vol. 20). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Daoud, A., & Celce-Murcia, M. (1979). Selecting and evaluating a textbook. In M. Celce-Murcia & L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 302-307). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

Dat, B. (2008). ELT materials used in Southeast Asia. In Tomlinson, B. (ed.). English Language Learning Materials (pp. 263-81). London: Continuum.

Demir, Y. & Ertaş, A. (2014). A suggested eclectic checklist for ELT coursebook evaluation. The Reading Matrix, 14(2), 243-252.

Dendrinos, B. (1992). The EFL textbook and ideology. Athens: Gri¬vas Publications.

Dougill, J. (1987). Not so obvious. In L. E. Shelden (ed.). ELT Textbook and Materials: Problems in Evaluation and Development. ELT Documents 126. (pp. 29-36) Oxford: Modern English Publications in association with The British Council. 302-307). New York: Newsbury House.

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36

Garvin, D. A. (1988). Managing wuality: The strategic and competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

Georgiou, S. I. (2012). Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT Journal, 66(4), 495–504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs047

Griffiths, C. (1995). Evaluating materials for teaching English to adult speakers of other languages. ELT Forum, 33(3), 153-168.

Hadley, P. A., Simmerman, A., Long, M., & Luna, M. (2000). Facilitating language development for inner-city children: Experimental evaluation of a collaborative, classroom-based intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(3), 280-295.

Hemsley, M. (1997). The evaluation of teachers' guides design and application. ELT Journal, 3(1), 72-83.

Hrehovcik, T. (2002). Foreign language textbook evaluation-methodological considerations. Retrieved from: http://www.univ.rzeszow.pl/fil_ang/usar1/sar_v1_18.pdf

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ioannou-Georgiou, S., & Pavlou, P. (2011). Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education. Cyprus: Cyprus Pedagogical Institute.

Jacobs, G., & Ball, J. (1996). An investigation of the structure of group Activities in ELT course books. ELT Journal, 50(2), 99-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.2.99

Jahangard, A. (2007). Evaluation of EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 130-50.

Jolly, D., R, Bolitho (2011). A framework for materials writing. In: Tomlinson, B. (ed.). Materials Development in Language Teaching (pp. 107-134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karamoozian, F. M., & Riazi, A. (2008). Development of a new checklist for evaluating reading comprehension textbooks. ESP World 7(3), 19-39.

Kausar, G., Mushtaq, M., Badshah, I. (2016). The evaluation of English language textbook taught at intermediate level. Gomal University Journal of Research, Special Issue 4, 32-43.

Khalid, M. (2009). Indicators for a quality textbook evaluation process in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 3(2), 158-176.

Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 31–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874913500801010030

Levis, J. M. (1999). Intonation in theory and practice revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 38-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588190

Liao, X. Q. (2000). How communicative language teaching became acceptable in secondary school in China. Internet TESL Journal, 6(10). Retrieved December 18, 2019, from http://www.aiteeh.ac.jp/~iteslj/Articles/Liao-CLT inChina.html

Littlejohn, A. P. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. In B. Tomlinson (ed.). Materials Development in Language Teaching (pp.190-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Littlejohn, A. P. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse, in Tomlinson, B. (ed.). Materials Development in Language Teaching (pp.179-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Litz, D. R. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean Case Study. Asian EFL Journal, 48(1), 1-53.

Long, M. H. (1990). Task, group, and task-group interactions. In S. Anivan (ed.). Language Teaching Methodology for the Nineties (pp. 31-50). U.S: U.S. Department of Education.

Mangubhai, F. (2005). What can EFL teachers learn from immersion language teaching? Asian EFL Journal, 7(4), 203-212.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Medina, L. B. (2016). Developing a CLIL textbook evaluation checklist. LACLIL, 9(1), 159-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.7

Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro 21, 15–33.

Miekley, J. (2005). ESL textbook evaluation checklist. The Reading Matrix, 5(2), 1-9.

Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Mukundan, J., & Ahour, T. (2010). A review of textbook evaluation checklists across four decades (1970–2008). In B. Tomlinson & H. Masuhara (Eds). Research for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for Best Practice (pp. 336-352). London: Continuum.

Mukundan, J., Hajimohammadi, R., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2011). Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 4(6), 21-28.

Naseem, S., Shah, S. K., & Tabassum, S. (2015). Evaluation of English textbook in Pakistan: A case study of Punjab textbook for 9th class. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 3(3), 24-42.

Nazeer, M., Shah, S. K., & Sarwat, Z. (2015). Evaluation of Oxon English textbook used in Pakistani public schools for 6th & 7th Grade. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 3(1), 51-79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v3i1.7778

Nguyen, V. L., Nguyen, H. D. & Than, T. L. N. (2006). English 6. Teacher’s manual. (4thed.). Hanoi: The Educational Publishing House.

Noori, A. (2018). Communicative language teaching (CLT) in EFL context: Exploring Afghan EFL lecturers’ perceived challenges in implementing CLT. International Journal of Research, 5(16), 1049-1063.

O’Neil, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.2.104

Prodromou, L. (1988). English as cultural action. ELT Journal, 42(2), 73–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.2.73

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Saadipour, A., & Shakouri, A. (2016). A comparative study of English textbooks in Iranian non-profit institutes and schools. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 4, 322-327.

Shah, S. K., Majeed, R., Ul-Waheed, S., & Anjum, M. A. I. (2013). Humanizing English textbooks evaluation at the higher secondary level in Pakistan. Language in India, 13(8), 481-499.

Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237 246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237

Skierso, A. (1991). Textbooks selection and evaluation, In M. Celce-Murcia, (ed.). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Boston: MA Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Stradling, R. (2001). Teaching 20th–century European history. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers’ perspectives. Educational Research and Review, 5(9), 508-517.

Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. London, New York: Continuum.

Tomlinson, B. (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. London: Continuum.

Tucker, C. A. (1975). Evaluating beginning textbooks. In H. S. Madsen and J. D. Bowen (Eds.). Adaptation in language teaching. Appendix 3 (pp. 219-237). Rowley, Mass: Newbury.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34-41.

Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/37.3.251

Yule, G., Matthis, T., & Hopkins, M. F. (1992). On reporting what was said. ELT Journal. 46(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.3.245

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Amna Arshad, & Mehmood, M. A. (2019). Investigating Content and Language Integration in an EFL Textbook: A Corpus-Based Study . Linguistic Forum - A Journal of Linguistics, 1(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2010.1.1.2