A Cognitive Study of Humor: A Pragmatic and Sociocultural Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2024.6.1.2Keywords:
Humor, Cognitive Processes, Pragmatics, Sociocultural Influences, Relevance Theory, Incongruity TheoryAbstract
This research conducts a comprehensive examination of humor through a cognitive, pragmatic, and sociocultural lens. Guided by a theoretical framework integrating Relevance Theory, Incongruity Theory, and Script-based Semantic Theory, the study employs a mixed-methods approach including online survey as well as collection of facts from already published articles. All the mentioned theories are interrelated as they provide a multifaceted exploration of humor’s cognitive processes, pragmatic elements, and sociocultural influences. The participant sample for this research is 80 students at the National University of Modern Languages, Faisalabad. Ethical considerations underscore the commitment to respectful research practices. The findings revealed that humor is a pervasive element in Faisalabad's daily life, predominantly manifested through verbal, visual, and situational forms. Notably, preferences for sarcasm and irony were prevalent, though individual responses varied, highlighting the influence of personal cognitive differences. The findings also underscored the embedded nature of humor within cultural norms and its complex role in communication. The study reveals that humor in Faisalabadi society is deeply influenced by cultural contexts and individual cognitive differences, serving as a dynamic tool for social interaction and cultural understanding.
Downloads
References
Abbas, N. F., & Ibraheem, S. D. (2016). A Pragmatic Study of Humor. Australian International Academic Centre, Australia.
Apte, M. L. (1985). Humor and laughter: An anthropological approach. Cornell University Press.
Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). The semantic script theory of humor. Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, S. (2002). Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 159–179). IOS Press.
Boxer, D., & Cortes-Conde, R. (1997). Humor in discourse: From a cognitive-pragmatic perspective. John Benjamins Publishing.
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Carrell, A. (2008). Historical views of humor. The primer of humor research (pp. 303-332). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chen, X., & Dewaele, J. M. (2019). The relationship between English proficiency and humor appreciation among English L1 users and Chinese L2 users of English. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(4), 653-676.
Chiaro, D. (1992). The Language of Jokes: Analyzing verbal play. London: Rout ledge.
Coser, R. L. (1959). Some social functions of laughter: Humor in hospital settings. Human Relations, 12(1), 17-34.
Davies, C. (1990). Ethnic humor around the world: A comparative analysis. Indiana University Press.
Davies, C. (2011). Jokes and targets. Indiana University Press.
Durkheim, É. (1897). Suicide: A study in sociology. The Free Press.
Farnia1, M., Farhangi, A., & Saeedi, M (2020). Cross-cultural Study of Perception of Humor by English Native Speakers and Iranian EFL Learners. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE). Volume 16, Number 2.
Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Norton & Company.
Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Intentionality and irony in language use. John Benjamins Publishing.
Gourd, A., & Goulden, C. (2008). Humor in the classroom: A critical analysis. Routledge.
Grice, H. P. (1975). “Logic and conversation.” In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3. Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
Gudykunst, W. B. (1998). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication. Sage Publications.
Hay, J. (2001). Humor, language, and gender in the workplace. Palgrave Macmillan.
Holmes, J. (2000). Introduction: Humor at work. Humor, 13(1), 5-26.
Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2002). Having a laugh at work: How humor contributes to workplace culture. Text, 22(3), 375-400.
Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., & Adams, R. B. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. MIT Press.
Kant, I. (18th century). Critique of judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. Macmillan.
Kuipers, G. (2006). Good Humor, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Walter de Gruyter.
Li C. Y., & Chen, I. C. (2006). Can They Comprehend with a Smile? Detecting EFL College Learner’s Perception of Ambiguity on Joke Comprehension, humor research, 1,135- 157. https://studylib.net/doc/15765132/can-they-comprehend-with-a-smile%3F
Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.
McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor: A psychological analysis. Mouton.
McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141-1149.
McGraw, A. P., Williams, L. E., & Warren, C. (2012). Too close for comfort, or too far for humor? Finding humor in distant tragedies and close mishaps. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1148-1154.
Morreall, J. (1983). Taking Laughter Seriously. SUNY Press.
Norenzayan, A. (2019). Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton University Press.
Norrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Indiana University Press.
Pérez, D., & Javier, F. (2017). The Translation of Humour Based on Culture-Bound Terms in Modern Family. A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach. MonTI. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación, núm. 9, 2017, pp. 49-75. Universitat de València Alicante, España. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=265155167002
Platow, M. J., Grace, D. M., Smithson, M., Louie, S., & McCarthy, G. (2005). Cultural diversity and humor: The role of intergroup contact and ethnic jokes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 757-770.
Powell, R. A., & Paton, E. G. (1988). Humor and stress: A critical analysis. Springer-Verlag.
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Springer.
Ritchie, G. (2010). The psychology of humor: A comprehensive analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
Shultz, T. R., & Pilon, R. (1973). Development of the ability to detect linguistic ambiguity. Child Development, 48(3), 728-733. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1127716?seq=1
Veale, T. G. (2002). The Incomputable Joke: Exploring the Boundaries of Humor, and the Nature of Computation. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research.
Veale, T. G. (2002). Incongruity and resolution in figurative language. John Benjamins Publishing.
Wagner, M. M., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2011). The use of humor in the foreign language classroom: Funny and effective? International Journal of Humor Research, 24(4), 399-434. https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/humr.2011.24.issue-4/humr.2011.024/humr.2011.024.xml
Warren, C., & McGraw, A. P. (2015). Humor as a benign violation: The role of violation, benignity, and psychological distance in humor appreciation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(3), 141-153.
Ziv, A. (1984). The functions of humor in the classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 77(4), 219-226.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nimra Noor, Dr. Aniqa Rashid, Tuba Latif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published by MARS Publishers are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. This means:
- everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles published in MARS Publishers' journals;
- everyone is free to re-use the published material if proper accreditation/citation of the original publication is given.