Examining Cohesion in Academic Writing: A Comparative Study of Organizational Skills in Pakistani and International Research Abstracts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2024.6.1.3Keywords:
cohesive devices, coherence, grammatical cohesion, lexical cohesion, pragmatic competenceAbstract
Effective writing demands strategic language use for both communicative impact and structural accuracy. Cohesion is one of the keys to achieving these goals (Sutherland, 2015). This study investigates the use of cohesive devices in Pakistani and Native writers’ research article abstracts, identifying the different used types and their functions, using the framework of Halliday and Hassan (1976). To achieve this, 50 abstracts were collected from two prominent international research journals (25 from each) of ‘W’ categories, compiled into a corpus, and analyzed manually. The findings revealed differences in grammatical and lexical cohesive device usage between the two groups. Native writers frequently used reference, clausal ellipsis, reiteration, and collocation, while Pakistani writers' abstracts showed a higher frequency of conjunctions, nominal ellipsis, and verbal ellipsis. Consequently, the abstracts by Native writers exhibited greater interconnectedness and flow of ideas. The results indicated that Pakistani writers primarily organized their texts at a syntactic level, suggesting the need for organizing texts at a semantic level.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Siddique, A. R. (2019). Organisational skills in academic writing: A study on coherence and cohesion in Pakistani research abstracts. Languages, 4(4), 92.
Bukhari, S., & Xiaoyang, Z. (2013). Linguistic Transfer in L2 Writing: A Study of Pakistani Students.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design. Lincoln: SAGE Publications Inc.
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language.
Demir, C. (2017). Lexical collocations in English: A comparative study of native and non-native scholars of English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 75-87.
Halliday, M.A.K., Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday & Matthiessen, (2014). An introduction to functional grammar, New York, Routledge.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Language learning.
McGee, I. (2009). Traversing the lexical cohesion minefield. ELT Journal, 63(3), 212-220.
Nisar, M., Ahmed, K., & Asif, M. (2023). The influence of Cultural Differences on Persuasive Writing Styles in Pakistani and Chinese EFL Learners. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies, 1(3), 281-302.
Ortega, L. (2014). Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge.
Sutherland, S. (2017). A beginner’s guide to discourse analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (Vol. 1). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Yarmohammadi, M., & Torabi, F. (2012). Cohesive Devices in Written Discourse: A Discourse Analysis of a Student’s Essay Writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.
Yule, G. (2022). The study of language. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Syeda Smeet Akif, Dr. Ayesha Asghar Gill, Dr. Muhmmad Asim Mahmood, Dr. Muhammad Rasid Mahmood
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published by MARS Publishers are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. This means:
- everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles published in MARS Publishers' journals;
- everyone is free to re-use the published material if proper accreditation/citation of the original publication is given.