A Corpus-Based Comparative Study of Derivational Morphemes Across ENL, ESL, EFL Learners Through ICNALE
Keywords:Morphemes , Derivational, Inflectional morphemes, Morphemic pattern, ICNALE
This corpus-based comparative study was about morphemic derivational patterns in grammatical categories: adjective, noun and verbs in different varieties: English as native language (ENL), English as second language (ESL), and English as foreign language (EFL). This study was done on data collected from ICNALE in which learners’ data from three different varieties of English was compared. The data was tagged through CLAWS tagger and analyzed through AntConc software. In result of analysis, the frequency-based differences in the morphemic derivational patterns were observed after normalizing the data. Such differences across varieties in morphemic patterns were realized through the existence and absence of derivational morphemes. The results showed that the native speakers have higher ability of using a greater number of morphemic patterns than second and foreign language speakers of English. Due to their native like competence, they are more competent is the usage of morphemic derivational patterns. Those distinctive patterns should also be taken as pedagogical implication for second and foreign language learners of English. It can also be helpful for second and foreign language learners in achieving native like ability to use English language.
Bauer, L. (1988). Introducing linguistic morphology (Vol. 57). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Boey, L. K. (1975). An introduction to linguistics for the language teacher. Singapore University Press for Regional English Language Centre.
Cook, H. M. (2008). Socializing identities through speech style: Learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Multilingual Matters.
Demirela, E. T., & Kazazoğlub, S. (2015). The comparison of collocation use by Turkish and Asian learners of English: the case of TCSE corpus and ICNALE corpus. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 174, 2278-2284.
Dost, I. N., & Bohloulzadeh, G. (2017). A Review of Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis with a Phonological and Syntactical View: A Cross Linguistic Study. The Buckingham Journal of language and linguistics, 10, 32-41.
Edwards, E. C. (2003). Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth-grade students’ ability to derive and infer word meanings. American educational research journal, 40(2), 447-494.
Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D. (2013). Understanding Morphology. Oxon: Routledge.
Ishikawa, S. (2011). A new horizon in learner corpus studies: the aim of the ICNALE project. Corpora and language technologies in teaching, learning and Research, 3-11.
Ishikawa, S. I. (2013). The ICNALE and sophisticated contrastive interlanguage analysis of Asian learners of English. Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world, 1(1), 91-118.
Ishikawa, S. I. (2019). The ICNALE Spoken Dialogue: A new dataset for the study of Asian learners’ performance in L2 English interviews. English Teaching, 74(4), 153-177.
Jassem, Z. A. (2013). The English, German, and French cognates of Arabic back consonants: A lexical root theory approach. International Journal of English and Education 2 (2), 108-128.
Kachru, B. B. (1981). “Socially realistic linguistics”: the Firthian tradition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1981(31), 65-90.
Kachru, B. B. (1985). The bilinguals’ creativity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 6, 20-33.
McCarthy, M., & O‟Keeffe, A. (2010). What are corpora and how have they evolved? In A. O‟Keeffe, & M. McCarthy, The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 3-13). Routledge.
Wardhaugh, R. (1970). The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 18-21
Yule, G. (2016). The study of language. Cambridge University Press.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.