A Review Study on the Enhancement of Oral Fluency in L2: An Investigation into Processes and Didactics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2022.4.1.2Keywords:
Oral fluency, Acquisition, Cognitive skills, Expression, EFL learnersAbstract
This paper principally endeavors to grant a thorough understanding of the cognitive and expressive mechanisms perpetually involved in the production of speech. It must be noted that oral fluency has proven to be one of the major skills that almost all EFL learners strive to achieve through conscious mental efforts and constant exposure. Oral fluency is then a cognitive process that requires the learner to use their meta-cognitive skills to both enhance the effectiveness and flow of speech, and simultaneously avoid speech errors.
Downloads
References
Bailey, K., & Savage, L. (Eds.). (1994). New ways in teaching speaking. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). L2 fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, pp. 655–679. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x
Derwing, T.M., Munro, M.J., & Thomson, R.I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29, pp. 359–380. doi:10.1093/applin/amm041
Dudley, L. (2007). Connecting L2 learners to the larger community. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, pp. 539–561. doi:10.3138/cmlr.63.4.539
Ejzenberg, R. (2000). The juggling act of oral fluency: A psycho-sociolinguistic metaphor. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 287–313). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, pp. 215–247. doi:10.1177/136216889900300303
Freed, B.F. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In B.F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, pp. 123–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, pp. 325–353. doi:10.1353/cml.2005.0016
Koponen, M., & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency, pp. 5–24. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: a quantitative approach. Language Learning 40(3), pp. 387-417.
Matthews, C. (1994). Speaking solutions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Meara, P., 2006. Emergent properties of multilingual lexicons. Applied Linguistics, 27, pp. 620-644.
Piccardo E. et al. (2011). Pathways through assessing, learning and teaching in the CEFR, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available at http://ecep.ecml.at/Portals/26/training-kit/files/2011_08_29_ECEP_EN.pdf. From the ECEP project publication.
Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14, pp. 423–441. doi:10.1080/01638539109544795
Rossiter, M. J. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), pp. 395–412. doi:10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pre.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published by MARS Publishers are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. This means:
- everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles published in MARS Publishers' journals;
- everyone is free to re-use the published material if proper accreditation/citation of the original publication is given.