The Discourse-Historical Approach andIdeologies in the Speeches of Turkish Presidents

Abstract

This study investigates the intricate relationship between discourse, power, and political ideologies. This study adopts the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), a well-established approach in linguistics, to explore the dynamics of power within discourse. Departing from previous research, this study takes a nuanced approach by focusing on the discursive and argumentative strategies employed by prominent Turkish leaders. In particular, the study conducts a comparative analysis of the language use of two influential Turkish presidents, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The aim is to shed light on the ideological distinctions in their discourse, employing the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) for a comprehensive analysis. Employing the DHA, this study unveils the use of specific rhetorical strategies, including the Shift of Blame, Legitimation, and Discontinuation, employed by these leaders. The findings underscore the persistent presence of ideology and power, discernible at various linguistic and structural levels within the political speeches of these leaders. The implications of this research extend to the understanding of the intricate interplay of language, power, and ideology within the political discourse. Future research can further explore the application of DHA in the analysis of political discourse, allowing for deeper insights into the communicative strategies employed by political leaders.