Promoting Social and Emotional Well-Being of ESL Students through Engaging and Inclusive Environment

Authors

  • Luisito M. Nanquil Bulacan State University, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2021.3.2.2

Keywords:

social and emotional well-being, instructional strategies, inclusivity, engaging learning environment, language teaching

Abstract

This paper aims to describe and highlight different ways and strategies on how language teachers can provide positive learning environment that may promote well-being of students or learners. In the current health and global crisis, more and more students feel stressed and anxious about what is happening around. This dominant emotion impedes their desire to continue learning because their concentration is affected hugely and widely. To achieve the primary goal of this study, the researcher employed qualitative method in the form of phenomenology. Through interview and conversation analysis, this paper pointed out various and helpful tips and insights from the findings. At the end, these tips are recommended to language teachers for inclusion and infusion in their online and offsite classes that can promote social and emotional well-being during times of disruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey, F., & Pransky, K. (2014). Memory at Work in the Classroom: Strategies to Help Underachieving Students. Alexandria. ASCD.

Brown, S., & Attardo, S. (2009). Understanding Language Structure, Interaction, and Variation: An Introduction to Applied Linguistics and Sociolinguistics for Nonspecialists, 2nd edition. The University of Michigan Press.

Fielder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Cooperative Learning. In P.A. Mabrouk (Ed.), Active Learning: Modules from the Analytical Sciences, pp. 34-53, American Chemical Society.

Gladwell, M. (2013). David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants. New York: Little Brown and Company.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible Learning and the Science of how we learn. Routledge.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during Instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), pp. 75-86.

Levy, F., & Rodkin, J. (2015). The Bloomberg Recruiter Report: Job Skills Companies want but can’t get. Retrieved from

http://www.bloomberg/graphics/2015-job-skills-report/

Marzano, R. J., & Toth, M. D. (2014). Teaching for Rigor: A Call for a Critical Instructional Shift. Learning Sciences Marzano Center, pp. 1-24.

Movitz, A. P., & Holmes, K. P. (2007). Finding Center: How learning centers evolved in a secondary, student-centered classroom. English Journal, 96(3), pp. 68-73.

Rollins, S. P. (2017). Teaching in the Fast Lane: How to Create Active Learning Experiences. ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tsegaye, A. G., & Davidson, L. M. (2014). The ratio of teacher talking time to students talking time in efl classroom: a case in six partner preparatory schools of haramaya university, Ethiopia. Abhniav: National Monthly Refereed Journal of Research in Arts & Education, 3(5), pp. 1-5.

Yair, G. (2000). Educational battlefields in America: The tug-of-war over students’ engagement with instruction. Sociology of Education, 73 (4), pp. 247-269.

_______ (2021). www.macmillanenglish.com

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Nanquil, L. M. . . . (2021). Promoting Social and Emotional Well-Being of ESL Students through Engaging and Inclusive Environment. Linguistic Forum - A Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2021.3.2.2